|
How Important is Training?
When it comes to shipping hazardous
materials, the importance of training can not be overstated. Following
are excerpts from some Federal Aviation Administration press
releases. Try to spot the trend.
FAA Proposes $70,000 Civil Penalty against Southwest Airlines for Hazmat Violations
FORT WORTH -- The Federal Aviation Administration has proposed
to assess a $70,000 civil penalty against Southwest Airlines
for allegedly violating Department of Transportation hazardous
materials regulations.
FAA alleged Southwest knowingly accepted a shipment containing hazardous materials as checked
baggage aboard one of its aircraft. The shipment consisted of
a box packed with 20 smaller boxes each containing 50 disposable
lighters. Such devices are classed as hazardous materials under
the regulations.
The shipment was clearly marked as "lighters" when Southwest accepted it, the FAA alleged.
Southwest is a "will-not-carry" airline for hazardous materials.
The airline transported the shipment from Houston to Dallas. A Southwest employee discovered the illegal
shipment when it was unloaded at Love Field. Southwest then notified
the FAA. The FAA has also issued a notice of proposed civil penalty to
the passengers who offered the shipment.
The company has 30 days from receipt
of the enforcement letter to respond to the agency. Announcement
of the proposed civil penalty is made in accordance with FAA's
policy of releasing information to the public on newly issued
enforcement actions in cases that involve penalties of $50,000
or more.
FAA Seeks $72,000 Civil
Penalty Against United Airlines for Shipping Undeclared Oxygen
Generator on Fedex
FORT WORTH--The Federal Aviation Administration has proposed
to assess a $72,000 civil penalty against United Airlines Inc.
for allegedly offering a damaged, unmarked and undeclared oxygen
generator to Federal Express for transportation by air from San
Francisco International Airport to a Texas firm.
The alleged violations
of federal hazardous materials regulations occurred last July
when United shipped the four-pound unexpended oxygen generator
from a United stores unit at San Francisco to Aviall Aircraft
Parts in Dallas aboard a FedEx cargo aircraft.
Aviall employees in Dallas
discovered the oxygen generator and notified the FAA. This shipment
was not accompanied by shipping papers and it was not properly
packaged, marked, labeled or declared as a hazardous material.
In addition, United failed to provide the required emergency
response information. United did not obtain the DOT approval
necessary to ship it by cargo aircraft. As a result, the FAA
alleged that United violated several federal hazardous materials
transportation regulations.
United has 30 days from
receipt of the enforcement letter to respond to the agency. Announcement
of the proposed civil penalty is made in accordance with the
FAA's policy of releasing information to the public on newly
issued enforcement actions in cases that involve penalties of
$50,000 or more.
The Federal Aviation Administration
has proposed assessing $60,000 in civil penalties against Predmor,
Inc., a Canadian company . . . for violating regulations regarding
the shipment of hazardous materials ... the FAA alleged that
representatives knowingly offered ... an improperly packaged,
labeled and documented shipment ...the FAA also alleged that
Predmor failed to train its employees to package and handle hazardous
materials.
FAA proposes $80,000 civil
penalty against Santa Ana company for hazmat violations. Applied
Industries Tech, Inc... offered the hazardous material for
shipment when it was not packaged, labeled, marked, classed,
described, documented ...or in condition for shipment ...
AIT also failed to ensure that employees were trained to properly
package and handle the hazardous materials ...
There is definitely a trend here.
Could these fines have been avoided if the companies had adhered
to the regulations involving the training of their staff?
FAA proposes $85,000 penalty
against Chicago company for hazmat violations. Paxton Patterson
... offered the hazardous materials for transportation when
it was not packaged, labeled, marked, classed, described, documented,
inspected, or in condition for shipment ... Paxton Patterson
also failed to ensure that employees were trained to properly
package and handle hazardous materials ...
FAA proposes $99,000 penalty
against Amerijet International for hazmat violations ... for
allegedly violating regulations concerning training employees
who handle hazardous materials which are offered for transport
aboard aircraft.
This is not so much a trend as it is a broken record. For one
percent of the above fine, a company could train four or five
employees.
FAA proposes fine against
Wurth USA Inc ... The Federal Aviation Administration issued
a notice proposing to assess a $110,000 civil penalty against
Wurth
USA ... investigators responded to a report of undeclared hazardous
materials shipments ... not properly described, classed, packaged,
marked, labeled and in the condition required for shipment by
air ... not all of the company's employees responsible for
handling hazardous materials had been trained in accordance with
the hazardous materials regulations.
FAA proposes $909,000 in
fines for hazmat violations ... 12 companies were cited for
improperly packaging, labeling, marking, classifying, documenting
or inspecting the shipments; or for allowing employees to package
and handle materials who were not trained to do so.
The obvious question here is why
not be safe? Why not save money? Why not adhere to all the international
regulations that insist that anyone who ships or handles Dangerous
Goods must be a trained person? If your company is involved in
shipping or handling Hazardous Materials of Class 6 Division 6.2 infectious
substances, Saf-T-Pak can help. We offer one-day training seminars
that are available all over North America. We have also produced
a leading edge, multi-media, interactive CD ROM of this training.
With this CD, staff can be trained in 2 to 4 hours.
When you consider the huge dollar
amounts of the civil penalties quoted above, the small cost of
training should be at the very top of your company's expenditure
list.
|